Based on the discussions, I propose that we use the following title for now
(We can always change it later on):
An SCA based Service Composition Framework
If there are no objections, I would like to take it forward quickly so that
Tuscany will show up in the Apache home page soon.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Haleh Mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:53 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org
Sounds better
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org
Sorry to be out of step, but I don't like like 5. It's too jargony
for the average person hovering on the Apache home page. Most people
at this level won't know what SCA is. Also, it doesn't contain the
word "Service", which IMO is essential in the hover text.
Instead of this, how about "Service Composition Framework"?
Simon
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1 for 5.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you want to make that 5 - An SCA based Composite Application
Framework?
++Vamsi
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Here are a list of candidates:
1. Composite SOA Applications using SCA
2. Composite SOA Application Framework using SCA
3. Build Composite SOA Applications using SCA
4. Enabling SOA with SCA
5. A SCA based Composite Application Framework
6. "Service Development and Assembly"
7. "Component model for services"
8. "Service Construction and Assembly"
9. "Service Component Architecture"
Let's pick one and move forward. It's just the hover text and we can
always
change that later on.
I pick 5 :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
PS: It looks like some replies went to the tuscany-dev while the rest
on
incubator-general. Let me add Simon Nash's comments here:
============================================================
Looking at other projects, about 4 words seems to be the normal
length of this, though a few take 10 or more.
I think we need something that doesn't use "jargon" but gives
the essence of Tuscany in plain language.
The goal is just to get someone to click on the link and explore
further. IMO, we shouldn't try to give a full technically accurate
description, just an idea of what kind of domain the project covers.
People at this level are just causally browsing and we want to
catch their eye without inti
[The entire original message is not included]
