Thanks Matthieu.
On 6/23/08, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Based on the discussions, I propose that we use the following title for > now > > (We can always change it later on): > > > > An SCA based Service Composition Framework > > > > If there are no objections, I would like to take it forward quickly so > that > > Tuscany will show up in the Apache home page soon. > > > > I've done the tagline update. Actually Niclas had already done the addition > some time ago but I guess nobody did an update since then so it wasn't live > yet. Anyway I've changed the tagline and updated the tree on people.a.o so > the link should appear later today. > > Matthieu > > > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Haleh Mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:53 PM > > To: <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org > > > > > > Sounds better > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:18 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org > >> > >> Sorry to be out of step, but I don't like like 5. It's too jargony > >> for the average person hovering on the Apache home page. Most people > >> at this level won't know what SCA is. Also, it doesn't contain the > >> word "Service", which IMO is essential in the hover text. > >> > >> Instead of this, how about "Service Composition Framework"? > >> > >> Simon > >> > >> Luciano Resende wrote: > >> > >>> +1 for 5. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Do you want to make that 5 - An SCA based Composite Application > >>>> Framework? > >>>> > >>>> ++Vamsi > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Here are a list of candidates: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Composite SOA Applications using SCA > >>>>> 2. Composite SOA Application Framework using SCA > >>>>> 3. Build Composite SOA Applications using SCA > >>>>> 4. Enabling SOA with SCA > >>>>> 5. A SCA based Composite Application Framework > >>>>> 6. "Service Development and Assembly" > >>>>> 7. "Component model for services" > >>>>> 8. "Service Construction and Assembly" > >>>>> 9. "Service Component Architecture" > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's pick one and move forward. It's just the hover text and we can > >>>>> always > >>>>> change that later on. > >>>>> > >>>>> I pick 5 :-). > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Raymond > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: It looks like some replies went to the tuscany-dev while the rest > >>>>> on > >>>>> incubator-general. Let me add Simon Nash's comments here: > >>>>> > >>>>> ============================================================ > >>>>> Looking at other projects, about 4 words seems to be the normal > >>>>> length of this, though a few take 10 or more. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think we need something that doesn't use "jargon" but gives > >>>>> the essence of Tuscany in plain language. > >>>>> > >>>>> The goal is just to get someone to click on the link and explore > >>>>> further. IMO, we shouldn't try to give a full technically accurate > >>>>> description, just an idea of what kind of domain the project covers. > >>>>> People at this level are just causally browsing and we want to > >>>>> catch their eye without inti > >>>>> > >>>> > >> [The entire original message is not included] > >> > > > > >
