Hi, Exciting times - having Tuscany listed on the front page of www.apache.org. What more could you possibly ask for :-)
A really minor point but I've just looked at the Tuscany link on the www.apache.org site and it has a space at the front of its name. The Turbine link on the line above is the same. Perhaps we could remove the space from the front of Tuscany? Thanks, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matthieu Riou > Sent: 23 June 2008 23:13 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CONCLUSION] Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to > http://www.apache.org > > Enjoy the spike in daily hits :) > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just checked www.apache.org and now Tuscany is listed as one of the > top > > level projects. > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "haleh mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:39 PM > > To: <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [CONCLUSION] Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to > > http://www.apache.org > > > > > > Thanks Matthieu. > >> > >> On 6/23/08, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Based on the discussions, I propose that we use the following title > for > >>> now > >>> > (We can always change it later on): > >>> > > >>> > An SCA based Service Composition Framework > >>> > > >>> > If there are no objections, I would like to take it forward quickly > so > >>> that > >>> > Tuscany will show up in the Apache home page soon. > >>> > > >>> > >>> I've done the tagline update. Actually Niclas had already done the > >>> addition > >>> some time ago but I guess nobody did an update since then so it wasn't > >>> live > >>> yet. Anyway I've changed the tagline and updated the tree on > people.a.o > >>> so > >>> the link should appear later today. > >>> > >>> Matthieu > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Raymond > >>> > > >>> > -------------------------------------------------- > >>> > From: "Haleh Mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:53 PM > >>> > To: <[email protected]> > >>> > Subject: RE: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Sounds better > >>> >> +1 > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -----Original Message----- > >>> >> From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> >> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:18 PM > >>> >> To: [email protected] > >>> >> Subject: Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org > >>> >> > >>> >> Sorry to be out of step, but I don't like like 5. It's too jargony > >>> >> for the average person hovering on the Apache home page. Most > people > >>> >> at this level won't know what SCA is. Also, it doesn't contain the > >>> >> word "Service", which IMO is essential in the hover text. > >>> >> > >>> >> Instead of this, how about "Service Composition Framework"? > >>> >> > >>> >> Simon > >>> >> > >>> >> Luciano Resende wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> +1 for 5. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy > >>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>>> Do you want to make that 5 - An SCA based Composite Application > >>> >>>> Framework? > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> ++Vamsi > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> >>>> wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Here are a list of candidates: > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> 1. Composite SOA Applications using SCA > >>> >>>>> 2. Composite SOA Application Framework using SCA > >>> >>>>> 3. Build Composite SOA Applications using SCA > >>> >>>>> 4. Enabling SOA with SCA > >>> >>>>> 5. A SCA based Composite Application Framework > >>> >>>>> 6. "Service Development and Assembly" > >>> >>>>> 7. "Component model for services" > >>> >>>>> 8. "Service Construction and Assembly" > >>> >>>>> 9. "Service Component Architecture" > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> Let's pick one and move forward. It's just the hover text and we > >>> >>>>> can > >>> >>>>> always > >>> >>>>> > >>> > >>
