Enjoy the spike in daily hits :) On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked www.apache.org and now Tuscany is listed as one of the top > level projects. > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "haleh mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:39 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [CONCLUSION] Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to > http://www.apache.org > > > Thanks Matthieu. >> >> On 6/23/08, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Based on the discussions, I propose that we use the following title for >>> now >>> > (We can always change it later on): >>> > >>> > An SCA based Service Composition Framework >>> > >>> > If there are no objections, I would like to take it forward quickly so >>> that >>> > Tuscany will show up in the Apache home page soon. >>> > >>> >>> I've done the tagline update. Actually Niclas had already done the >>> addition >>> some time ago but I guess nobody did an update since then so it wasn't >>> live >>> yet. Anyway I've changed the tagline and updated the tree on people.a.o >>> so >>> the link should appear later today. >>> >>> Matthieu >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Raymond >>> > >>> > -------------------------------------------------- >>> > From: "Haleh Mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:53 PM >>> > To: <[email protected]> >>> > Subject: RE: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org >>> > >>> > >>> > Sounds better >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:18 PM >>> >> To: [email protected] >>> >> Subject: Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> Sorry to be out of step, but I don't like like 5. It's too jargony >>> >> for the average person hovering on the Apache home page. Most people >>> >> at this level won't know what SCA is. Also, it doesn't contain the >>> >> word "Service", which IMO is essential in the hover text. >>> >> >>> >> Instead of this, how about "Service Composition Framework"? >>> >> >>> >> Simon >>> >> >>> >> Luciano Resende wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> +1 for 5. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy >>> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Do you want to make that 5 - An SCA based Composite Application >>> >>>> Framework? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> ++Vamsi >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Here are a list of candidates: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> 1. Composite SOA Applications using SCA >>> >>>>> 2. Composite SOA Application Framework using SCA >>> >>>>> 3. Build Composite SOA Applications using SCA >>> >>>>> 4. Enabling SOA with SCA >>> >>>>> 5. A SCA based Composite Application Framework >>> >>>>> 6. "Service Development and Assembly" >>> >>>>> 7. "Component model for services" >>> >>>>> 8. "Service Construction and Assembly" >>> >>>>> 9. "Service Component Architecture" >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Let's pick one and move forward. It's just the hover text and we >>> >>>>> can >>> >>>>> always >>> >>>>> >>> >>
