On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Based on the discussions, I propose that we use the following title for now
> (We can always change it later on):
>
> An SCA based Service Composition Framework
>
> If there are no objections, I would like to take it forward quickly so that
> Tuscany will show up in the Apache home page soon.
>

I've done the tagline update. Actually Niclas had already done the addition
some time ago but I guess nobody did an update since then so it wasn't live
yet. Anyway I've changed the tagline and updated the tree on people.a.o so
the link should appear later today.

Matthieu


>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Haleh Mahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:53 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org
>
>
>  Sounds better
>> +1
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 1:18 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: TLP migration: Adding Tuscany to http://www.apache.org
>>
>> Sorry to be out of step, but I don't like like 5.  It's too jargony
>> for the average person hovering on the Apache home page.  Most people
>> at this level won't know what SCA is.  Also, it doesn't contain the
>> word "Service", which IMO is essential in the hover text.
>>
>> Instead of this, how about "Service Composition Framework"?
>>
>>  Simon
>>
>> Luciano Resende wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for 5.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you want to make that 5 - An SCA based  Composite Application
>>>> Framework?
>>>>
>>>> ++Vamsi
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Here are a list of candidates:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Composite SOA Applications using SCA
>>>>> 2. Composite SOA Application Framework using SCA
>>>>> 3. Build Composite SOA Applications using SCA
>>>>> 4. Enabling SOA with SCA
>>>>> 5. A SCA based Composite Application Framework
>>>>> 6. "Service Development and Assembly"
>>>>> 7. "Component model for services"
>>>>> 8. "Service Construction and Assembly"
>>>>> 9. "Service Component Architecture"
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's pick one and move forward. It's just the hover text and we can
>>>>> always
>>>>> change that later on.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pick 5 :-).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Raymond
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: It looks like some replies went to the tuscany-dev while the rest
>>>>> on
>>>>> incubator-general. Let me add Simon Nash's comments here:
>>>>>
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> Looking at other projects, about 4 words seems to be the normal
>>>>> length of this, though a few take 10 or more.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we need something that doesn't use "jargon" but gives
>>>>> the essence of Tuscany in plain language.
>>>>>
>>>>> The goal is just to get someone to click on the link and explore
>>>>> further.  IMO, we shouldn't try to give a full technically accurate
>>>>> description, just an idea of what kind of domain the project covers.
>>>>> People at this level are just causally browsing and we want to
>>>>> catch their eye without inti
>>>>>
>>>>
>> [The entire original message is not included]
>>
>
>

Reply via email to