Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:On further investigation, I see that some of the artifacts already have artifact names like scatours-xxx, not tuscany-scatours-xxx. I didn't realise this when I sent my previous email. So another way to achieve consistency would be to rename the artifacts that are currently using tuscany-scatours-xxx names to use scatours-xxx names. Is this a better solution? Or tuscanyscatours to have some relationship with the package name. Simon> I think consistency with the maven module name is more natural. This seems to be our normal convention for maven artifact names. That was why I suggested travelsample. Simon
I'd like to go ahead and make these changes. We have three options that have been proposed: 1. Use travelsample-xxx for all the maven artifacts. 2. Use scatours-xxx for all the maven artifacts. 3. Use tuscanyscatours-xxx for all the maven artifacts. My first preference is 1, second preference 2. Other views? Simon
