On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I've been going through the samples and making a few notes on the >> WIKI. It's clear with the reorg of the samples that the READMEs need >> finxing up in a fairly significant way. I could try to do this as I'm >> going through, but I'm aware that things might still be in a state of >> flux. I'd like to try to avoid aiming at a moving target if I can. >> Can anyone who is planning on further structural changes to the >> samples please give me a heads up. >> >> Kelvin. >> > > +1 am planning to help out with this. Am waiting until Ant has done > what he wants to re. subdirectories. > > I think the READMEs can be smaller now. +1 -- I was just looking for user type doc on contributions, so that a readme could just point out to the website for background info. If I don't find any then I'll try putting something together.
Kelvin. At least for the calculator > based samples. So I suggest we do a launcher one and a contribution > one and have a quick review. For samples that haven't been changed yet > we can just tidy the README up. > > Simon > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
