I'd like to be able to reference a website documentation on the
concept of a "launcher",  but I don't think that's an SCA spec
concept; I think it's a Tuscany thing - am I right?  If so, then
adding a section to [1] is muddying the water, as currently all the
headings in that page are all true SCA spec concepts. I can develop a
page something like "Tuscany SCA concepts", but my key requirement
here is the reference from the samples readme that will go out with
the release, so to a degree I'm more concerned about getting the
website structure right, rather than the content at this very moment.
Would it seem natural to extend the SCA introduction page with tuscany
concepts, or to make a fresh page?  Alternatively we could have a
glossary page.  That would allow me to sidestep the issue, as in such
a page it would be fine to have a mixture of the concepts and just be
clear in the description whether the item being described was a
tuscany or an SCA concept.

thoughts?

Kelvin.

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/SCA+Introduction

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:47 PM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> I found a definition of a contribution at [1], so I'll update  the
>> samples README to talk about contributions and launchers. I guess I
>> will either find or create a paragraph about launchers and reference
>> it in the same way.
>>
>> Isuppose that the README is going to have to be in 2 parts, one part
>> that talks about the new approach of separation into
>> launchers/contributions and the other part which talks about those
>> samples that remain in the existing arrangement for M5.
>>
>> Kelvin.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/SCA+Introduction#SCAIntroduction-scacontribution.
>>
>>
>
>
> Right, M5 is a milestone so I don't see any harm in presenting a work
> in progress.
>
> Simon
>
> --
> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>

Reply via email to