Having looked at the website I can't find any user oriented doc about contributions per se, so there's something to do there; but this opens up the wider issue that this reorg of samples is going to require quite a bit of update to the website in order to make it match up. How do we do that? Do we somehow keep the old stuff for people working with the current release (although I get the feeling the doc might not be wholly up to date with the current release), or do we simply attempt to keep the 2.x doc in step with the latest .x release?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:55 AM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:41 AM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> I've been going through the samples and making a few notes on the >>>> WIKI. It's clear with the reorg of the samples that the READMEs need >>>> finxing up in a fairly significant way. I could try to do this as I'm >>>> going through, but I'm aware that things might still be in a state of >>>> flux. I'd like to try to avoid aiming at a moving target if I can. >>>> Can anyone who is planning on further structural changes to the >>>> samples please give me a heads up. >>>> >>>> Kelvin. >>>> >>> >>> +1 am planning to help out with this. Am waiting until Ant has done >>> what he wants to re. subdirectories. >>> >>> I think the READMEs can be smaller now. >> +1 -- I was just looking for user type doc on contributions, so that a >> readme could just point out to the website for background info. If I >> don't find any then I'll try putting something together. >> >> Kelvin. > > Excellent! > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
