On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> I'd like to be able to reference a website documentation on the
> concept of a "launcher",  but I don't think that's an SCA spec
> concept; I think it's a Tuscany thing - am I right?  If so, then
> adding a section to [1] is muddying the water, as currently all the
> headings in that page are all true SCA spec concepts. I can develop a
> page something like "Tuscany SCA concepts", but my key requirement
> here is the reference from the samples readme that will go out with
> the release, so to a degree I'm more concerned about getting the
> website structure right, rather than the content at this very moment.
> Would it seem natural to extend the SCA introduction page with tuscany
> concepts, or to make a fresh page?  Alternatively we could have a
> glossary page.  That would allow me to sidestep the issue, as in such
> a page it would be fine to have a mixture of the concepts and just be
> clear in the description whether the item being described was a
> tuscany or an SCA concept.
>
> thoughts?
>
> Kelvin.
>
> [1] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/SCA+Introduction
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:47 PM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I found a definition of a contribution at [1], so I'll update  the
>>> samples README to talk about contributions and launchers. I guess I
>>> will either find or create a paragraph about launchers and reference
>>> it in the same way.
>>>
>>> Isuppose that the README is going to have to be in 2 parts, one part
>>> that talks about the new approach of separation into
>>> launchers/contributions and the other part which talks about those
>>> samples that remain in the existing arrangement for M5.
>>>
>>> Kelvin.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/SCA+Introduction#SCAIntroduction-scacontribution.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Right, M5 is a milestone so I don't see any harm in presenting a work
>> in progress.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> --
>> Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
>>
>

I would try and be as generic as you can with links as I'm sure
detailed web links/structure will change in the future. For example, a
link the 2.x documentation page is reasonable. We need to make it
obvious from there where people need to look for specific information.
If it's not then we aren't doing a very good job with the web site.

On the questions about pages. I can't get to the site at the moment
for some reason but it would seem sensible to separate Tuscany
concepts from SCA specific concepts. I would also seem useful to have
a glossary.

On the specific point about launchers. Launchers are just convenience
programs that we use to start the Tuscany runtime in circumstances
where there is nothing else to provide a main(). For example, in a web
container we would expect the container to provide the main() so we
don't have a launcher.

Simon


-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Reply via email to