The popular convention (maven, Eclipse, others) is to now include the version with the name of the jar. This is being overridden by some custom Maven configuration to exclude the version for the Jars produced by the build for DUCC.
Has this been discussed / debated and was there a good justification for this approach? If not, I would lean toward following the more prevalent software packaging practice these days, which seems to include the version as part of the jar name. See, for example the ducc distribution runtime lib/ directory where the majority (but not all) seem to follow this practice. -Marshall
