I've reviewed DUCC's NOTICE file and checked each image relevant Creative Commons Licenses.
There are two images from public domain so I am not sure if these should stay or not. On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > On 11/22/2013 1:45 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > > Sorry, correction. I did not mean to say: > > "I thought I had to add attribution information to LICENSE file for every > > image used in DUCC." > > > > Instead > > > > "I thought I had to add attribution information to NOTICE for every > image > > used in DUCC." > The requirement for attribution varies from license to license. For > instance, > the creative commons cc by 3.0 has an attribution clause. The creative > commons > cc 0 doesn't. > > Some attributions are satisfied by the particular license. Others have a > "general" license, with the required attribution going into the notice > file. > > So, the answer is, it depends ... ;-) > > -Marshall > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Yes, Spring notice was a cut and paste bug. > >> > >> I will remove all "This product includes ..." > >> > >> What about the images? Should I yank those too or change the wording to > >> something else? > >> I thought I had to add attribution information to LICENSE file for every > >> image used in DUCC. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > >> > >>> This file contains incorrect statements such as: > >>> > >>> This product includes software, Spring Framework, developed > >>> at the Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > >>> > >>> (I don't think Spring was an Apache project...) > >>> > >>> See http://apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files where > >>> it says, > >>> under Bundling Other ASF Products, that > >>> > >>> It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes > software > >>> developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF > copyright > >>> line > >>> and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. > >>> > >>> -Marshall > >>> > >> > >
