Yes, Spring notice was a cut and paste bug. I will remove all "This product includes ..."
What about the images? Should I yank those too or change the wording to something else? I thought I had to add attribution information to LICENSE file for every image used in DUCC. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > This file contains incorrect statements such as: > > This product includes software, Spring Framework, developed > at the Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > (I don't think Spring was an Apache project...) > > See http://apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files where it > says, > under Bundling Other ASF Products, that > > It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software > developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright > line > and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. > > -Marshall >
