I'll update the doc to change the extension … tgz used to be right but Maven uses a different convention.
The -so suffix stands for stand-alone, and is an artifact of how Latex process the docs - there is a skeleton called install-so.tex that imbeds the installation chapter from the main duccbook. I'll rename it to 'installation.tex' . Jim On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will change README to make it explicit that DUCC runs on Linux only (and > possibly MAC OS?) > > Jim please update the duccdocs to address the naming inconsistencies in the > distr file. > > There are two profiles under which duccdocs are built: apache-release and > build-duccdocs. Running > with apache-release requires GDP passphrase. I thought that there should be > an easy way to > build duccdocs for those that are not set up for GDP. I think this is a > correct approach. > > Jim, can you handle the name change of the install-so.xxx. > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > >> The readme has a section 5.1 "Supported Platforms". I believe that DUCC >> only is >> supported on Linux? This isn't mentioned here. >> >> The installation instructions (in duccdocs) say the distr file is named >> ".... >> -[version] . tgz" whereas, it appears to be named: " ... -[version]- . bin >> . tar >> . gz. Later parts of the documentation continue to refer to .tgz. >> >> The profile for building the duccdocs was renamed to be just the >> apache-release >> profile, but the documentation and the comments in the pom still say to use >> -Pbuild-duccdocs. >> >> The install instruction pdf/html is called "install-so.xxx" ? Should the >> "-so" >> be dropped? >> >> -Marshall >> >>
