Sorry, correction. I did not mean to say: "I thought I had to add attribution information to LICENSE file for every image used in DUCC."
Instead "I thought I had to add attribution information to NOTICE for every image used in DUCC." On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <uim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, Spring notice was a cut and paste bug. > > I will remove all "This product includes ..." > > What about the images? Should I yank those too or change the wording to > something else? > I thought I had to add attribution information to LICENSE file for every > image used in DUCC. > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > >> This file contains incorrect statements such as: >> >> This product includes software, Spring Framework, developed >> at the Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). >> >> (I don't think Spring was an Apache project...) >> >> See http://apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files where >> it says, >> under Bundling Other ASF Products, that >> >> It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software >> developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright >> line >> and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. >> >> -Marshall >> > >
