A note on that: I've installed and ran on Fedora 19. I've also built (but not ran) on OS x 10.9
From: Jim Challenger <chall...@gmail.com> To: dev@uima.apache.org Date: 11/21/2013 12:52 PM Subject: Re: Early review of DUCC pre-release - README and install-so The installation manual states the following as a prerequisite: "Reasonably current Linux. DUCC has been tested on SLES 10.2, 11.1, and 11.2, and RHEL 6.3." It does work on (and includes small bit of specific code for) OSx but that isn't "supported", per-se. Are you saying that we should explicitly state, in addition, that DUCC is supported only on Linux? Jim On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > The readme has a section 5.1 "Supported Platforms". I believe that DUCC only is > supported on Linux? This isn't mentioned here. > > The installation instructions (in duccdocs) say the distr file is named ".... > -[version] . tgz" whereas, it appears to be named: " ... -[version]- . bin . tar > . gz. Later parts of the documentation continue to refer to .tgz. > > The profile for building the duccdocs was renamed to be just the apache-release > profile, but the documentation and the comments in the pom still say to use > -Pbuild-duccdocs. > > The install instruction pdf/html is called "install-so.xxx" ? Should the "-so" > be dropped? > > -Marshall >
