Kay Schenk wrote: > The process we used is NOT flawed
The process used by the website project IS seriously flawed. Ask Andrew Brown who has been here for a few years. It is impossible to get things done. The opinions, work, and contributions of people here are just completely ignored. What usually happens, it seems, is that someone higher up simply decides to kill a proposal by having it discussed to death. Eventually all the workers who designed it give up in frustration, and when there's no one left standing you can go on and do whatever you wnat. This is how the website project seems to work. This is flawed, and severely dysfunctional. It doesn't just happen with the home page design. It happens when you want to change a stupid image and after 18 months, the image is still there. It happens when you want to update a few links, make some minor edits, and after a couple of months, all your work is still sitting in IZ. It happens when you write a contribution page which is unquestionably superior to the present one, and it still sits in IZ for 6 months. This is not the sign of a healthy project. The process really and truly is flawed. Sincerely, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
