:murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
I think the claims made by Drew in his last e-mail are very valid, and I
would not like to see that some designer is putting a lot of effort in a
website design that is hardly being used because we had an unclear
strategy.
yes...this IS a problem :(
If something is temporary, why not just wait till things are set up
properly?
Before thinking about what how portal.openoffice.org should look I think
we should think about openoffice.org as a whole. If end-users are a
concern right now, I am not sure whether we need to say goodbye to
collabnet if it is about static pages. As others have pointed out, other
projects have been able to build good looking websites around collabnet.
We need a plan before moving all to a new domain.
I heartily agree...I think we need to go back to your most recent
slides, the ones you posted as a revision to Matthias's, on Sat and
start there. Really, I think putting out the "visual" plan in this form
is extremely valuable.
It does NO good to discuss all this stuff at cross purposes. I DO
understand what Louis is saying vis a vis Collabnet in terms of some
basic features it provides. i.e the cvs capabilities and mailing lists.
I think we can make best use of our time right now by forgetting about
the underlying implementation framework and focusing on how we want
things to work.
The visuals are a GOOD thing for this.
cheers!
g.,
Maarten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
============================================================
Kay Schenk
"Put up in a place
where it's easy to see
the cryptic admonishment
T. T. T.
When you feel how depressingly
slowly you climb,
it's well to remember that
Things Take Time."
-- Piet Hein
[the Grooks guy]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
