I dont think that this is great. Becouse if you use image on baground you cant use alt, title, ... It is really bad for disaeble people. (for people who use screen reader for access webpages)(and it also not so good for SEO) I would also consider use object instand of img....becouse of alterniteve text... also for disable people it will be great to use accesskeys on links...
Sincerely Michal Svaty On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ivan M ha scritto: > > (Andrea, a response to the point you raised is below under proposed > > HTML changes - please let me know if I've got it right) > > Yes, thanks! > > > * Based on Andrea's request, adding id's to the header - for the OOo > > logo, we could make it a background image, so that it can be > > overridden by CSS for local flavors of the logo, and add an empty <a> > > tag with a specified witdth and height so that the current behavior of > > clicking on the logo will take you to OpenOffice.org. NL projects > > could set this to display:none if they don't want such behavior. > > The positioner could also be given an id so that the default one can > > be set to display:none on NL pages, and using absolute positioning, > > they can add their own positioner text through their HTML... ? > > I would put even more ids, because, while it is extremely easy to add > one, it is extremely annoying trying to access something via CSS or > JavaScript and discover it hasn't been given an id. > > So: > - OK for using a background image for the logo (nice idea) > - The empty <a> should have its own id too > - The "the free and open productivity suite" heading should have its > own id too. > > Regards, > Andrea Pescetti. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
