On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote: > Sam Ruby wrote on 6/22/18 8:25 PM: >> I'm curious, why are these two considered Executive officers, and >> people like Sally and Gavin are not? > > Does it matter?
-1 to any definition that is random and capricious. :-) It should be consistent. I can't conceive of any definition that includes Daniel Ruggeri that does not include Sally. Craig's own definition included Chris, but he didn't add Chris. Perhaps someone can propose a definition that we can use? I only suggested my definition as it was consistent with how the agenda has been produced since before I was secretary. Just be aware that if a person is listed as an executive officer, that name will be a part of the monthly roll call UNLESS that person takes an explicit action. - Sam Ruby
