ahha, here is something we need to change. we should have a mountedmapper that allows one to mount a requesthandler rather then a page. the user should not go as far as having to implement requestablepage, there are a lot of extraneous methods there if all you want to do is handle the request yourself.
-igor On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > The great thing for me is that I'll be able to mounting something that > just implements RequestablePage interface, not only a Page class > descendants (if I've read this code correctly :)). It allows to handle > navigation more flexible and it allows to avoid creating hard to > maintain page class hierarchies. > > -- > Daniel >
