Looks like an overall improvement. Definitively reduces the spaghetti a bit. Not crazy about getCompatibilityScore though. I understand it's purpose and maybe it's the best solution, but it looks like a crutch.
Eelco On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: > ahha, here is something we need to change. we should have a > mountedmapper that allows one to mount a requesthandler rather then a > page. the user should not go as far as having to implement > requestablepage, there are a lot of extraneous methods there if all > you want to do is handle the request yourself. > > -igor > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.st...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The great thing for me is that I'll be able to mounting something that >> just implements RequestablePage interface, not only a Page class >> descendants (if I've read this code correctly :)). It allows to handle >> navigation more flexible and it allows to avoid creating hard to >> maintain page class hierarchies. >> >> -- >> Daniel >> >
