+1 Beware of lazyness driven crud buildup; although I have always had distate for '*I*Model'...
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Johan Compagner <[email protected]>wrote: > I am 0 but leaning towards -1 because i really dont like renaming > IModel to Model, because that would cause many weird things/compile > problems in my project, and i think thats would be the same for > others. > > Besides that i agree with martijn that then all the books and > documentations are 1 one blow depricated.. > > But if there are really many people for the change i wil not veto it > or something. I only do think it brings more trouble then it fixes. > > On 06/10/2009, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I've tried to do a tally of the informal votes (since this was a > > discussion thread). There ended up being a lot of noise on the thread, > so I > > may not have got every vote since some were throwing votes in for > renaming > > model, etc. Anyway, here's what we came up with: > > > > FOR (2 binding / approximately 9 non-binding): > > Matej Knopp > > Igor Vaynberg > > > > > > AGAINST (3 binding / approximately 9 non-binding): > > Martijn Dashorst > > Jeremy Thomerson > > Eelco Hillenius > > > > NO VOTE: > > Johan Compagner (commented on thread, but I wasn't sure what vote > was > > - I think he was voting on model thing) > > Upayavira Alex Karasulu Ate Douma Gwyn Evans Jonathan > > Locke Juergen Donnerstag Janne Hietamäki Frank Bille Jensen > Al > > Maw Jean-Baptiste Quenot Gerolf Seitz Timo Rantalaiho > > > > So, can we please all go use our time to look at the *much more > important* > > URL refactoring? Or do we want to continue discussing a divided subject? > > > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > -- Rodolfo Hansen CTO, KindleIT Software Development Email: [email protected] Office: 1 (809) 732-5200 Mobile: 1 (809) 299-7332
