Ok let's call it Creative Moments :-D kind regards
Tobias > Am 28.12.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: > > > >> On 28/12/2016 14:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only required if you >> check out the github repository. >> >> @Andrea sorry that I caused confusion. >> >> @Martin thanks for that hint - seems that I really enjoyed the vacation to >> run into such thoughts. ;-) >> > Don't worry. It's nice to see I'm not the only one experiencing these > "creative" moments :D >> kind regards >> >> Tobias >> >>> Am 28.12.16 um 14:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov: >>> Hi Tobias, >>> >>> The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not released >>> at all with Wicket distro. >>> It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it. >>> >>> Martin Grigorov >>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Andrea, >>>> >>>> is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be, >>>> because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the >>>> staged version released with version 4? >>>> >>>> kind regards >>>> >>>> Tobias >>>> >>>> Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: >>>> >>>> Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository ( >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/) >>>>> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>> >>>>>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no >>>>>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for >>>>>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now >>>>>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with >>>>>> wicket. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we >>>>>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be >>>>>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the >>>>>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not >>>>>> available. >>>>>> >>>>>> kind regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Tobias >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific >>>>>>> to do for the release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >>>>>>>>>> @Martijn >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it >>>>>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i >>>>>>>>>>> will try >>>>>>>>>>> later this evening . >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one >>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> One short note: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts? >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :)) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
