On 28/12/2016 14:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
Hi Martin,
doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only required if
you check out the github repository.
@Andrea sorry that I caused confusion.
@Martin thanks for that hint - seems that I really enjoyed the
vacation to run into such thoughts. ;-)
Don't worry. It's nice to see I'm not the only one experiencing these
"creative" moments :D
kind regards
Tobias
Am 28.12.16 um 14:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
Hi Tobias,
The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not
released
at all with Wicket distro.
It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Andrea,
is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this
can't be,
because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So
is the
staged version released with version 4?
kind regards
Tobias
Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene:
Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/)
does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module.
On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
Hi Andrea,
no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no
requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2
was for
7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the
release now
this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each
time with
wicket.
Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a
4 we
also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there
will be
issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the
marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4
is not
available.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
<[email protected]>:
I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something
specific
to do for the release?
On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
Hi Andrea,
did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
kind regards
Tobias
Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene
<[email protected]>:
ok, I've manually closed it.
On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
@Martijn
I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can
create it
but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org
/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue?
On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Thanks a lot Andrea!
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]>
wrote:
everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i
will try
later this evening .
On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]>
wrote:
I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a
long one
:-)
On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Hello,
Any news on topic?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:
One short note:
eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there
are only
1,2,3 -
3
is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
kind regards
Tobias
Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
[email protected]>:
Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to
make a
release
so it might take some time :)
On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There
were some
things
with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those
are not
insurmountable.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <
[email protected]
wrote:
Hi Tobias,
According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any
project
that
already
uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6
months
from the
announcement).
I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but
only if
we have
few
weeks to test before making a release.
I just want to avoid something like: you merge the
branches
today and
few
days later Martijn cuts the release.
@Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the
release
scripts?
Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
possible to
run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one
person can
make a
release.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
should the release already exclude json.org or not - that
would be
my
question.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
[email protected]
:
I might find some time before the new year but I am not
100%
sure
yet.
Andrea.
On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
We could use org.json without legal issues until April
2017.
Good to know :)
So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be
merged
to the
"production" branches only if we have some time to
test
in those
branches.
I prefer to merge them right after the release of
6.26/7.6
so we
have
time
to find any issues.
I don't want this change to be merged and two days
later
to make
a
release.
We could use org.json without legal issues until
April 2017.
My 2c.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello Sven,
Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
It was sort of scheduled [1]
I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3]
changes
:)))
I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases
would
be great
Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
WDYT?
[1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Maxim,
your on the right list :P
There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
Have fun
Sven
On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there
are no
estimates? :)
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
[email protected]
wrote:
Hello All,
Do you have any estimates for the subject?
Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
