Hi Tobias, The eclipse module is not a child of the parent pom, so it is not released at all with Wicket distro. It is released by itself only when there are any changes in it.
Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be, > because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the > staged version released with version 4? > > kind regards > > Tobias > > Am 27.12.16 um 14:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: > > Master branch has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository ( >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/) >> does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module. >> >> >> On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrea, >>> >>> no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no >>> requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for >>> 7.x and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now >>> this is nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with >>> wicket. >>> >>> Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we >>> also need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be >>> issues for all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the >>> marketplace - there will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not >>> available. >>> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific >>>> to do for the release? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>> >>>>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3? >>>>> >>>>> kind regards >>>>> >>>>> Tobias >>>>> >>>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> ok, I've manually closed it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >>>>>>> @Martijn >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it >>>>>>> but it's not exposed (https://repository.apache.org >>>>>>> /content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). Any clue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i >>>>>>>> will try >>>>>>>> later this evening . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one >>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any news on topic? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> One short note: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only >>>>>>>>>>> 1,2,3 - >>>>>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some >>>>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those >>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months >>>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches >>>>>>>>>>>>>> today and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> scripts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can >>>>>>>>>>>> make a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :)) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be great >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
