kriegaex commented on PR #133: URL: https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/pull/133#issuecomment-1837374897
> so you could add [`@Isolated`](https://junit.org/junit5/docs/snapshot/api/org.junit.jupiter.api/org/junit/jupiter/api/parallel/Isolated.html) annotation to the test method so JUnit executes the test in isolation from the others. It does not hurt to have several isolated tests. That would be an option. Like I said, I wanted to avoid it in the very first example. Bad precedent. But actually, it is not such a bad idea. Within the isolated class, the tests could still run in parallel, however, i.e. asserting on log output via a single redirected log stream would still be a problem. But the suppression problem would be worked around. The real solution is to log both using (not newly introducing) a framework on different log levels, like I said in my previous message. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org
