Yeah, the bind test also fails for me consistently, ZK-1256 did not solve it. I 
don't get any other junit test failures, though.

-Flavio

> On 07 Jul 2016, at 14:46, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm working on it, but I've got test failures here because we have so many
> flaky tests, and I can't tell if this is just our standard level of fucked
> up tests or something new, or something in my setup, or what. But beyond
> the bind test which always fails when I run it on my macbook, the netty
> suites are failing. I'm pretty close to giving this a -1 for that reason
> alone.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hey PMC,
>> 
>> Where are your votes?
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I need to leave for vacation now.  Unfortunately, the binding votes have
>>> not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release process before
>> I
>>> leave.  I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18.  I can pick up the work
>>> then.  Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence and someone
>>> else wants to complete the release, please feel free.  If we go that way,
>>> then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties from
>> Patrick
>>> to make up for it.
>>> 
>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally on the
>>>> [VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is:
>>>> 
>>>> 1 +1 (binding)
>>>> 4 +1 (non-binding)
>>>> 
>>>> Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to push this
>>>> [VOTE] to completion?  Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to