I'm back. Thanks to everyone who kept testing and voting while I was out. At this point, the tally is:
2 +1 (binding) 5 +1 (non-binding) Can we please get one more PMC member to try the release candidate and cast a vote? (Camille, thank you for your testing and investigation of the test failures you saw. I understand the choice to abstain.) --Chris Nauroth On 7/7/16, 11:16 AM, "Michael Han" <[email protected]> wrote: >Add my data points: >Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04). >Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in 5 >runs. >Source used for testing: >http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zooke >eper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz > >On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec >> FAILED >> Waiting for server down >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143) >> at >> >> >>org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(Reconfig >>Test.java:436) >> at >> >> >>org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit >>4ZKTestRunner.java:79) >> >> FAILED >> Waiting for server down >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306) >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64) >> >> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not >> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier >>version of >> this code for me. >> >> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have the >> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that >>will >> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the problem is >> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing with >> this right now. >> >> C >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly >>doesn't >> > mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload >>logs so >> > that we can have a look. >> > >> > -Flavio >> > On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> > >> > > NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone >> > > confirm if this is an env issue? >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier >><[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and >> does >> > > > not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a >> > > staging >> > > >> cluster at work. >> > > >> >> > > >> Sorry for the lag. >> > > >> >> > > >> -rgs >> > > >> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Hey PMC, >> > > >> >> > > >> Where are your votes? >> > > >> >> > > >> -Flavio >> > > >> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" >><[email protected]> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > I need to leave for vacation now. Unfortunately, the binding >> votes >> > > have >> > > >> > not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release >>process >> > > >> before I >> > > >> > leave. I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18. I can pick up >> the >> > > work >> > > >> > then. Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence >>and >> > > >> someone >> > > >> > else wants to complete the release, please feel free. If we go >> that >> > > >> way, >> > > >> > then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties >>from >> > > >> Patrick >> > > >> > to make up for it. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > --Chris Nauroth >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally >>on >> the >> > > >> > >[VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >1 +1 (binding) >> > > >> > >4 +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to >>push >> > > this >> > > >> > >[VOTE] to completion? Thank you. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >--Chris Nauroth >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >-- >Cheers >Michael.
