What are the votes you're counting? I thought that myself, Raul, and Pat had voted +1. The three of us are PMC members.
-Flavio > On 19 Jul 2016, at 21:41, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm back. Thanks to everyone who kept testing and voting while I was out. > > At this point, the tally is: > > 2 +1 (binding) > 5 +1 (non-binding) > > Can we please get one more PMC member to try the release candidate and > cast a vote? (Camille, thank you for your testing and investigation of > the test failures you saw. I understand the choice to abstain.) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 7/7/16, 11:16 AM, "Michael Han" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Add my data points: >> Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04). >> Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in 5 >> runs. >> Source used for testing: >> http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zooke >> eper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec >>> FAILED >>> Waiting for server down >>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143) >>> at >>> >>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(Reconfig >>> Test.java:436) >>> at >>> >>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit >>> 4ZKTestRunner.java:79) >>> >>> FAILED >>> Waiting for server down >>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306) >>> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64) >>> >>> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not >>> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier >>> version of >>> this code for me. >>> >>> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have the >>> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that >>> will >>> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the problem is >>> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing with >>> this right now. >>> >>> C >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly >>> doesn't >>>> mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload >>> logs so >>>> that we can have a look. >>>> >>>> -Flavio >>>> On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone >>>>> confirm if this is an env issue? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier >>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and >>> does >>>>>> not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a >>>>> staging >>>>>>> cluster at work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry for the lag. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -rgs >>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey PMC, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where are your votes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" >>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I need to leave for vacation now. Unfortunately, the binding >>> votes >>>>> have >>>>>>>> not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release >>> process >>>>>>> before I >>>>>>>> leave. I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18. I can pick up >>> the >>>>> work >>>>>>>> then. Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence >>> and >>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>> else wants to complete the release, please feel free. If we go >>> that >>>>>>> way, >>>>>>>> then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties >>> from >>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>> to make up for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally >>> on >>> the >>>>>>>>> [VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1 +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>> 4 +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to >>> push >>>>> this >>>>>>>>> [VOTE] to completion? Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers >> Michael. >
