I had miscounted the vote from Raúl as non-binding, based on this page listing him as committer instead of PMC.
http://zookeeper.apache.org/credits.html Thank you for the clarification. We have the votes we need. (Side note: let's update that page.) --Chris Nauroth On 7/19/16, 9:44 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]> wrote: >What are the votes you're counting? I thought that myself, Raul, and Pat >had voted +1. The three of us are PMC members. > >-Flavio > >> On 19 Jul 2016, at 21:41, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> I'm back. Thanks to everyone who kept testing and voting while I was >>out. >> >> At this point, the tally is: >> >> 2 +1 (binding) >> 5 +1 (non-binding) >> >> Can we please get one more PMC member to try the release candidate and >> cast a vote? (Camille, thank you for your testing and investigation of >> the test failures you saw. I understand the choice to abstain.) >> >> --Chris Nauroth >> >> >> >> >> On 7/7/16, 11:16 AM, "Michael Han" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Add my data points: >>> Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04). >>> Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in 5 >>> runs. >>> Source used for testing: >>> >>>http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zoo >>>ke >>> eper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec >>>> FAILED >>>> Waiting for server down >>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>>> at >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143) >>>> at >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(Reconf >>>>ig >>>> Test.java:436) >>>> at >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUn >>>>it >>>> 4ZKTestRunner.java:79) >>>> >>>> FAILED >>>> Waiting for server down >>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>>> at >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64) >>>> >>>> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not >>>> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier >>>> version of >>>> this code for me. >>>> >>>> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have >>>>the >>>> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that >>>> will >>>> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the problem >>>>is >>>> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing >>>>with >>>> this right now. >>>> >>>> C >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly >>>> doesn't >>>>> mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload >>>> logs so >>>>> that we can have a look. >>>>> >>>>> -Flavio >>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone >>>>>> confirm if this is an env issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier >>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and >>>> does >>>>>>> not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a >>>>>> staging >>>>>>>> cluster at work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry for the lag. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -rgs >>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey PMC, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where are your votes? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I need to leave for vacation now. Unfortunately, the binding >>>> votes >>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release >>>> process >>>>>>>> before I >>>>>>>>> leave. I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18. I can pick up >>>> the >>>>>> work >>>>>>>>> then. Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence >>>> and >>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>>> else wants to complete the release, please feel free. If we go >>>> that >>>>>>>> way, >>>>>>>>> then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties >>>> from >>>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>>> to make up for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally >>>> on >>>> the >>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1 +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>> 4 +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to >>>> push >>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] to completion? Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> Michael. >> > >
