Add my data points:
Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04).
Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in 5 runs.
Source used for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote:

> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec
>         FAILED
> Waiting for server down
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down
>         at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241)
>         at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143)
>         at
>
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(ReconfigTest.java:436)
>         at
>
> org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUnit4ZKTestRunner.java:79)
>
>         FAILED
> Waiting for server down
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down
>         at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241)
>         at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306)
>         at
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64)
>
> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not
> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier version of
> this code for me.
>
> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have the
> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that will
> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the problem is
> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing with
> this right now.
>
> C
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly doesn't
> > mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload logs so
> > that we can have a look.
> >
> > -Flavio
> > On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone
> > > confirm if this is an env issue?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and
> does
> > > > not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a
> > > staging
> > > >> cluster at work.
> > > >>
> > > >> Sorry for the lag.
> > > >>
> > > >> -rgs
> > > >> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hey PMC,
> > > >>
> > > >> Where are your votes?
> > > >>
> > > >> -Flavio
> > > >> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I need to leave for vacation now.  Unfortunately, the binding
> votes
> > > have
> > > >> > not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release process
> > > >> before I
> > > >> > leave.  I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18.  I can pick up
> the
> > > work
> > > >> > then.  Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence and
> > > >> someone
> > > >> > else wants to complete the release, please feel free.  If we go
> that
> > > >> way,
> > > >> > then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties from
> > > >> Patrick
> > > >> > to make up for it.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --Chris Nauroth
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > >With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally on
> the
> > > >> > >[VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >1 +1 (binding)
> > > >> > >4 +1 (non-binding)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to push
> > > this
> > > >> > >[VOTE] to completion?  Thank you.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >--Chris Nauroth
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Cheers
Michael.

Reply via email to