On 4 September 2017 at 17:15, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > The correct way to deal with appstream is to add the appstream data to > rpm headers and then teach createrepo to make the appropriate metadata > files.
I'm sure we've had this discussion before, but: * What happens if a single package contains two desktop files? * Would we embed a 32bit color 128x128 icon in the rpm header (10kb per app)? * Would we embed all the translations in the appdata file, or just the entire appdata file (92kb per app)? * Would we include the entire .desktop file and all the translations there too? > you would then have appropriate appdata in the server, > workstation etc repos We'd have larger rpms for no end-user gain. The metadata just has to exist long enough to be collected into one large AppStream file (and included in the metadata repomd. I see no gain whatsoever for distributing the single-package appstream metadata as part of the package download or included in the rpmdb. It's just a workaround, just the same as running appstream-builder+modifyrepo on a tree of built rpms is. Richard. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
