Hello Pavel, On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:15:42 PM CET Michal Novotny wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Michal Novotny <cl...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček <msima...@redhat.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > >> > > >>> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. > > >>> > > >>> Pavel > > >>> > > >>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Because we are unable to find a consensus on implementation details, > > >>>> it's > > >>>> likely we'll drop this feature from copr API and it will be > probably a > > >>>> bit > > >>>> more complicated to setup mock chroot for local tests in future > (you'll > > >>>> need to have builder machine with copr-rpmbuild installed, which > brings > > >>>> a > > >>>> lot more runtime dependencies at least). > > >>>> > > >>>> From user perspective, do you mind if we dropped `copr mock-config` > > >>>> command? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> I didn't know this command existed, but there were multiple times in > the > > >> past where I wished something like this had been available (It didn't > exist > > >> back then). It was usually situation like this: "Hi, I'm trying to > build > > >> $package in $copr and it fails because of $build_tool that you > maintain, > > >> can you help me?". And since I had no idea how his copr was set up, > it took > > >> me a lot of time before I was able to reproduce the problem. So, I > would > > >> find the feature useful, especially in instances outside Fedora, which > > >> usually have more complex configurations. > > >> If it had to be dropped, I'd appreciate if copr could display the > > >> configuration of given project for non-owners. That way it would be > easier > > >> to construct my own config, without trying to guess stuff based on > the logs. > > >> > > > > > > First, thanks for your input. This is very useful information for us. > > > Next, I would like to ask if it was ok to put all the functionality > about > > > build-testing and building itself into just a single package: > > > copr-rpmbuild. I think having things on just one place can help us > focus on > > > doing them really well and as the copr-rpmbuild tool is already > responsible > > > for building, I think it would be a perfect place to add additional > > > build-debugging functionality like printing-out/dumping mock configs, > > > enablement to run just a part of the build process, possibility to > enter > > > the build environment interactively etc. Would this be alright? > > > > > > > I need to add that with this tool you really need to know _what_ you are > > building to be on the safe side. It is similar to running rpmbuild > locally > > (unless you are really just dumping mock configs). > > I use 'copr mock-config' for working with buildroot, even if I don't want > to build anything (mock --shell). So except from mock, any other deps > installed by copr-rpmbuild are useless and I don't want them on my box > basically. > Alright, we can set some most prominent deps of copr-rpmbuild as weak deps. It will be then possible to install the minimal package setup e.g. with: # dnf -y install copr-rpmbuild --setopt=install_weak_deps=False I opened https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/222. Thanks! > > Pavel > > > > Thank you again for your feedback > > > Michal > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Michael > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> copr-devel mailing list -- copr-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists. > fedorahosted.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
