On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:09 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> There's a good reason we have the change deadlines we do - and
> honestly I think dropping a subpackage (as opposed to retiring which
> is more visible) is sufficiently disruptive (and annoyingly invisible
> otherwise) that it should go through the Change process.

It wouldn't be remotely viable to have a Change for every dropped
subpackage. It'd completely overwhelm the process.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to