>>>>> "GH" == Gerald Henriksen <ghenr...@gmail.com> writes:

GH> On the other hand, unbuildable packages could be viewed as a
GH> security risk.

I mentioned security explicitly in my message.  Just not in the portion
you quoted.

GH> If you can't just fix the security issue and rebuild, but instead
GH> have to also fix the issue(s) that prevent the package from
GH> rebuilding this could cause delays in getting a security update out.

I mean, nothing currently guarantees that security fixes go out in a
timely manner, for all sorts of reasons.  If we're going to get serious
about reducing that time, I would think there's a more productive way to
do that than dumping all FTBFS packages because they _might_ one day
have a security issue that needs fixing.  But yes, certainly dump all
that have open security bugs.

 - J<
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to