Thanks for responding quickly.
On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 03:05:11 AM -05:00:00, Benjamin Gilbert
<bgilb...@backtick.net> wrote:
One option is to remove all loaders from gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra
except XPM, at least in Rawhide.
I recommend doing this. Then we can see if anybody complains about the
other missing loaders.
Meanwhile I've filed [1] to ask for XPM support in Glycin, and if we
get that I think it's reasonable to retire -modules-extra.
Good plan.
If Glycin rejects XPM, then another option is to reenable XPM in the
main gdk-pixbuf2 package. Although that might not be the *best* option,
because that will fail if the code gets deleted upstream in the future,
which seems possible. With gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra as a separate
source package, you could stay on older upstream package version
forever if that happens.
Michael
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
