On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 6:35 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 03:05:11 AM -05:00:00, Benjamin Gilbert > <bgilb...@backtick.net> wrote: > > One option is to remove all loaders from gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra > > except XPM, at least in Rawhide. > > I recommend doing this. Then we can see if anybody complains about the > other missing loaders. > Done in F44; I'll leave F43 as is. I looked through the reverse deps' dist-gits and any linked BZs, and none of them report a specific need for anything other than BMP, PPM, or XPM. If Glycin rejects XPM, then another option is to reenable XPM in the > main gdk-pixbuf2 package. Although that might not be the *best* option, > because that will fail if the code gets deleted upstream in the future, > which seems possible. With gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra as a separate > source package, you could stay on older upstream package version > forever if that happens. > Yeah, the separate source package seems best. Any packages that need XPM have presumably gained a -modules-extra dependency by now. --Benjamin Gilbert
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
