Dne 11. 03. 26 v 2:20 odp. Marius Schwarz napsal(a):
is it generally possible to have a mass review of packages of the same kind?
In general, no.
But you always can ask FESCO of FEPCO for exception. However, I do not think it
is good idea.
Recently, Tom Callaway was in similar situation. He split huge texlive package into several smaller package. Smaller
than previous huge one. But even that "small" packages have over 1k lines of SPEC file :)
I did a package review for these packages. It was 52 reviews. Despite the fact that Tom is very experienced packager, I
found many issues in first packages, many of them were common errors (common for all remaining packages). Most of these
packages went through review in less than one month. The review of the last packages in the batch were mostly without a
problem and one review took about 15 minutes.
My recommendation:
- find somebody who will review all your packages.
- but not in one batch, review every package separately.
- send the packages for review in small batches of ~5 packages.
- lower the feedback loop. I.e. when reviewer give you feedback work on that
immediately.
- learn from already done reviews and amend your SPEC files that are in queue
for review.
If you find good reviewer you can be done with all 18 packages in a few days.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
