On 16/03/2026 08:25, David Bold wrote:
I guess the best would be to request an exception from the FPC, as
documented:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exemption_Procedure
Best, David
I agree with Miroslav Suchý that simply finding an interested reviewer
and having all of the packages reviewed normally is the best approach.
It is quite common, in general, to find that some members of a group of
similar and related packages actually have their own unique issues. If
no such issues are found, then the repetitive nature of the reviews
should make it easy for a reviewer to churn through them quickly.
On 16/03/2026 08:25, David Bold wrote:
But adding a new subpackage or updating any subpackage, will create an
update for all subpackage. This is not great for users, mirrors and
koji's storage.
As it was already mentioned that mass-rebuild should be skipped for
these packages, as they are just copied binary blobs, we should try to
keep the number of updates rather low by having different spec and srpms.
Absolutely. If the models are generally updated at different times,
rather than together all at once, then packaging them separately will
reduce bandwidth and storage requirements *tremendously* over time.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
