Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> said: > At this point we're talking about the (first) feature freeze, not the > final release. The question is whether there's a violation of the > feature process if anaconda doesn't have support for usrmove *right > now*, not whether there's a problem if it doesn't have support by > release time.
As I quoted, features are supposed to be "substantially complete", and something that _requires_ anaconda changes should not be considered anywhere near complete if the required changes haven't been written yet. This isn't a case of a bug in anaconda not holding up the Alpha release; it is a feature that is definately not complete and testable after the feature freeze has passed. -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
