On 05/30/2012 12:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
To be honest it's a pain in the neck to deal with such packages, and unless there's an overwhelming need, I can't recommend it. Does any user really need to parallel install both versions of glusterfs?
No, and in fact that would not work. (And it's not the problem we're trying to solve.)
If glusterfs-3.2.x + HekaFS is installed, we essentially want to avoid ever updating to glusterfs-3.3.x because HekaFS is not compatible with it.
One way I can solve this is to never ship glusterfs-3.3.x on f16 and f17 (and EPEL el6).
I'd be perfectly happy saying we will never ship glusterfs-3.3.x on f16 and f17, but the reality is that there probably are people who want it.
Along the same lines, I'd be happy saying we will not ship HekaFS in f18 once glusterfs-3.3.x is out, but there are probably people who want glusterfs-3.2.x, with or without HekaFS.
And FWIW, doing nothing doesn't resolve the glusterfs in EPEL versus glusterfs in the RHS Channel issue.
-- Kaleb -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
