On 05/30/2012 03:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best >> strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile >> for those that wish to play. For gluster 3.3 I suggest a feature page >> for F-18 / rawhide. Is it feasible for the missing hekafs features to >> be merged into the 3.3 release train by October when F-18 is due to be >> released? > > I was under the impression that glusterfs would be automatically carried > forward from f17 into f18, as it apparently was from f16 into f17.
It is, barring a newer build in the f18 target. > F18 builds (of 3.2.6) are already available in koji. Until now I haven't > heard that a feature page is needed for 3.2.x (or 3.3.x) to be included > in f18. (But how to deprecate HekaFS on f18 once the glusterfs-3.3.0 > build is available.) No feature page is required, but in cases of notable changes in functionality, it is usually worthwhile. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > The features that are in HekaFS (in f16 and f17) will get merged into > glusterfs-3.3.1+, as I indicated previously, but I won't promise how > many of them will be there when f18 ships. We certainly hope that all of > them will be, but we aren't making any promises. Fair enough. I still think 3.3+ in f18+ makes the most sense. ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
