On 05/30/2012 01:08 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 05/30/2012 12:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
To be honest it's a pain in the neck to deal with such packages, and
unless there's an overwhelming need, I can't recommend it. Does any
user really need to parallel install both versions of glusterfs?
No, and in fact that would not work. (And it's not the problem we're
trying to solve.)
If glusterfs-3.2.x + HekaFS is installed, we essentially want to avoid
ever updating to glusterfs-3.3.x because HekaFS is not compatible with it.
And HekaFS aside, I could also make the case that we don't want people
to blindly update from glusterfs-3.2.x to glusterfs-3.3.x.
Another option I'd be willing to consider is leaving glusterfs-3.2.x
alone, i.e., as glusterfs-3.2.x-y.fc16, but release glusterfs-3.3.x as
glusterfs33, i.e. glusterfs33-3.3.x-1.fc16.
--
Kaleb
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
