I just received about a dozen bugs like this: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:16:42PM +0000, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850364 [...] > Summary: Introduce new systemd-rpm macros in watchdog spec file [...] > Fedora 18 changes the way how to work with services in spec files. It > introduces new macros - %systemd_post, %systemd_preun and %systemd_postun; > which replace scriptlets from Fedora 17 and older (see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850016).
I'm not objecting to getting the bug being filed or to the packaging change. However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is (a) in a much better position to change the packages because they understand the problem and the solution, and (b) ought to take on this work because that's part of whatever feature/cleanup/etc they are proposing, instead of pushing part of that work off to everyone else. Therefore, I think a better Bugzilla message would have been: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Fedora 18 changes the way how to work with services in spec files. > [etc as above] > > If you would like to make this change to your own package, you > don't need to do anything now. > > If you would like the reporter to fix your package, please add > a comment to this bug saying so within the next [2 weeks]. The > reporter will take care of this fix for you and unless there are > complications you won't need to do anything else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
