On Tue, 21.08.12 13:24, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote: > Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> writes: > > Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> writes: > >>> Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated, > >>> one needs to enable or disable them again. > > >> Huh? That doesn't happen given the current (F16/F17) scriptlets AFAICS. > >> They don't touch the service's enable state. > > > Maybe what I am seeing is something different. I certainly have services > > turn back on after updates that I have disabled. sendmail is one example. > > Hm, that seems pretty odd. sendmail's %post script is > > %post > if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then > # Initial installation > /bin/systemctl enable sendmail.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > /bin/systemctl enable sm-client.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > /bin/systemctl daemon-reload >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > fi
As a side note: the explicit "daemon-reload" command is unnecessary, as the reload is already implicitly done by "enable". In fact, since there are two enable lines this will even result in a total of 3 full reloads. Shortening this to "systemctl enable sendmail.service sm-client.service" is much nicer. (That all said, instead of patching this it is probably a good idea to just port things over, to the new macros). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
