On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:42 +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > ps. imho the irq handling and some cores (like the uart one) needs some > rework. atm the driver code needs to manually ack the UART irq, which is a > lm32 arch specific function call (apart from that, the uart driver is > generic). Additionally, there is no polling possible atm with the UART > core.
What about making the IRQs level-sensitive with IP read-only (as discussed on IRC) and make the "IRQ active" bit visible in each core's status registers? _______________________________________________ http://lists.milkymist.org/listinfo.cgi/devel-milkymist.org IRC: #milkymist@Freenode Twitter: www.twitter.com/milkymistvj Ideas? http://milkymist.uservoice.com
