On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> I have been testing a multiple node mesh with ath5k and Authsae,
>
> We are working our way up to 15 units in a mesh to do some stress testing.
>
> We have run into a snag and not sure what to look at from here.
>
> We have latest Kernel 3.6 with latest Compat-wireless build
> We have the latest iw and authsae from GIT
>
> Everything comes up and on-line with out any problem initially.
>
> The issue we see is that some units, (Not all of them and not all the same
> units) will show
>
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901686.331237)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901526)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901686.331237)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901701.695901)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901527)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901701.696901)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901717.61565)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901528)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901717.61565)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901732.426229)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901529)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901732.426229)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901747.790893)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901530)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901747.791893)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901762.131713)
> new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901531)
> NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901762.131713)
>
> If I do a iw dev mesh2 station dump I see
> iw dev mesh2 station dump
> Station 00:15:6d:94:4f:76 (on mesh2)
>     inactive time:    545 ms
>     rx bytes:    800
>     rx packets:    16
>     tx bytes:    0
>     tx packets:    0
>     tx retries:    0
>     tx failed:    0
>     signal:      -30 dBm
>     signal avg:    -30 dBm
>     Toffset:    10133145424 us
>     tx bitrate:    1.0 MBit/s
>     mesh llid:    0
>     mesh plid:    0
>     mesh plink:    LISTEN ------  LISTEN STATE COULD BE ATTRIBUTED BY NO
> MFP?
>     authorized:    no
>     authenticated:    no
>     preamble:    long
>     WMM/WME:    yes
>     MFP:        no  -------  NOTICE NO MFP
>     TDLS peer:        no
> Station 00:15:6d:94:5a:39 (on mesh2)
>     inactive time:    17702 ms
>     rx bytes:    1539
>     rx packets:    23
>     tx bytes:    1090
>     tx packets:    7
>     tx retries:    6
>     tx failed:    1
>     signal:      -62 dBm
>     signal avg:    -61 dBm
>     tx bitrate:    1.0 MBit/s
>     mesh llid:    0
>     mesh plid:    0
>     mesh plink:    ESTAB
>     authorized:    yes
>     authenticated:    yes
>     preamble:    long
>     WMM/WME:    yes
>     MFP:        yes
>     TDLS peer:        no
> Station 00:15:6d:94:6e:6b (on mesh2)
>     inactive time:    721 ms
>     rx bytes:    544314
>     rx packets:    6054
>     tx bytes:    254624
>     tx packets:    883
>     tx retries:    58
>     tx failed:    0
>     signal:      -46 dBm
>     signal avg:    -46 dBm
>     Toffset:    490313930 us
>     tx bitrate:    54.0 MBit/s
>     mesh llid:    0
>     mesh plid:    0
>     mesh plink:    ESTAB
>     authorized:    yes
>     authenticated:    yes
>     preamble:    long
>     WMM/WME:    yes
>     MFP:        yes
>     TDLS peer:        no
>
> If I reboot the routers the same thing happens.
> I have tried with and without nohwencrypt=1
> I have also applied the patch
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg95993.html which was missing
> for the latest build
> any help on what to look for would be appreciated.
>

I think this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1429831/ was
meant to replace the one you applied. Can you try without Chun-Yeow's
original mgmt frame encryption patch for ath5k?

Thomas
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to