Maybe this will help * I *did a dmesg on the routers and have a bunch of these messages on the routers in LISTEN state
WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c:272 ath5k_hw_setup_4word_tx_desc+0x66/0x1a4 [ath5k]() They are only on the routers that are not connected. Fred On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]>wrote: > I just added another 2 nodes to the mesh and they are having random issues > with LISTEN and no MFP > > So I have a total of 6 nodes online now. With 4 ESTAB and the rest LISTEN > and no MFP > > The funny thing is if I reboot all 6 routers they will randomly ESTAB and > LISTEN. Not like there is something to point at. > > I still get the same messages as below. > > Is there a way to identify what level of AUTHSAE is failing that I can try? > > Fred > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:47 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Chun-Yeow, >> >> I tried it without nohwcrypt=1 and still the same issue. >> >> Fred >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, Fred >>> >>> Using the latest compat-wireless, you can ignore the nohwcrypt=1 while >>> loading ath5k. >>> >>> --- >>> Chun-Yeow >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:42 AM, fred veldini <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Ok I recompiled without the older patch and still have the same issues. >>> > >>> > I did try to create the mesh without authsae and everything works fine. >>> > >>> > Is there anything I can do to help identify the issue? >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > Fred >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:33 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I will try it and let you know, thanks for the quick reply. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Pedersen <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, fred veldini < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello Group, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I have been testing a multiple node mesh with ath5k and Authsae, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > We are working our way up to 15 units in a mesh to do some stress >>> >>> > testing. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > We have run into a snag and not sure what to look at from here. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > We have latest Kernel 3.6 with latest Compat-wireless build >>> >>> > We have the latest iw and authsae from GIT >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Everything comes up and on-line with out any problem initially. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > The issue we see is that some units, (Not all of them and not all >>> the >>> >>> > same >>> >>> > units) will show >>> >>> > >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901686.331237) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901526) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901686.331237) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901701.695901) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901527) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901701.696901) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901717.61565) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901528) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901717.61565) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901732.426229) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901529) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901732.426229) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901747.790893) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901530) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901747.791893) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901762.131713) >>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901531) >>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901762.131713) >>> >>> > >>> >>> > If I do a iw dev mesh2 station dump I see >>> >>> > iw dev mesh2 station dump >>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:4f:76 (on mesh2) >>> >>> > inactive time: 545 ms >>> >>> > rx bytes: 800 >>> >>> > rx packets: 16 >>> >>> > tx bytes: 0 >>> >>> > tx packets: 0 >>> >>> > tx retries: 0 >>> >>> > tx failed: 0 >>> >>> > signal: -30 dBm >>> >>> > signal avg: -30 dBm >>> >>> > Toffset: 10133145424 us >>> >>> > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s >>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plink: LISTEN ------ LISTEN STATE COULD BE ATTRIBUTED >>> BY >>> >>> > NO >>> >>> > MFP? >>> >>> > authorized: no >>> >>> > authenticated: no >>> >>> > preamble: long >>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>> >>> > MFP: no ------- NOTICE NO MFP >>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:5a:39 (on mesh2) >>> >>> > inactive time: 17702 ms >>> >>> > rx bytes: 1539 >>> >>> > rx packets: 23 >>> >>> > tx bytes: 1090 >>> >>> > tx packets: 7 >>> >>> > tx retries: 6 >>> >>> > tx failed: 1 >>> >>> > signal: -62 dBm >>> >>> > signal avg: -61 dBm >>> >>> > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s >>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plink: ESTAB >>> >>> > authorized: yes >>> >>> > authenticated: yes >>> >>> > preamble: long >>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>> >>> > MFP: yes >>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:6e:6b (on mesh2) >>> >>> > inactive time: 721 ms >>> >>> > rx bytes: 544314 >>> >>> > rx packets: 6054 >>> >>> > tx bytes: 254624 >>> >>> > tx packets: 883 >>> >>> > tx retries: 58 >>> >>> > tx failed: 0 >>> >>> > signal: -46 dBm >>> >>> > signal avg: -46 dBm >>> >>> > Toffset: 490313930 us >>> >>> > tx bitrate: 54.0 MBit/s >>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>> >>> > mesh plink: ESTAB >>> >>> > authorized: yes >>> >>> > authenticated: yes >>> >>> > preamble: long >>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>> >>> > MFP: yes >>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>> >>> > >>> >>> > If I reboot the routers the same thing happens. >>> >>> > I have tried with and without nohwencrypt=1 >>> >>> > I have also applied the patch >>> >>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg95993.html which >>> was >>> >>> > missing >>> >>> > for the latest build >>> >>> > any help on what to look for would be appreciated. >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> I think this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1429831/ was >>> >>> meant to replace the one you applied. Can you try without Chun-Yeow's >>> >>> original mgmt frame encryption patch for ath5k? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thomas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Devel mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Devel mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
