I will try it and let you know, thanks for the quick reply. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Group, > > > > I have been testing a multiple node mesh with ath5k and Authsae, > > > > We are working our way up to 15 units in a mesh to do some stress > testing. > > > > We have run into a snag and not sure what to look at from here. > > > > We have latest Kernel 3.6 with latest Compat-wireless build > > We have the latest iw and authsae from GIT > > > > Everything comes up and on-line with out any problem initially. > > > > The issue we see is that some units, (Not all of them and not all the > same > > units) will show > > > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901686.331237) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901526) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901686.331237) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901701.695901) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901527) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901701.696901) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901717.61565) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901528) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901717.61565) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901732.426229) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901529) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901732.426229) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901747.790893) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901530) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901747.791893) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901762.131713) > > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901531) > > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901762.131713) > > > > If I do a iw dev mesh2 station dump I see > > iw dev mesh2 station dump > > Station 00:15:6d:94:4f:76 (on mesh2) > > inactive time: 545 ms > > rx bytes: 800 > > rx packets: 16 > > tx bytes: 0 > > tx packets: 0 > > tx retries: 0 > > tx failed: 0 > > signal: -30 dBm > > signal avg: -30 dBm > > Toffset: 10133145424 us > > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s > > mesh llid: 0 > > mesh plid: 0 > > mesh plink: LISTEN ------ LISTEN STATE COULD BE ATTRIBUTED BY NO > > MFP? > > authorized: no > > authenticated: no > > preamble: long > > WMM/WME: yes > > MFP: no ------- NOTICE NO MFP > > TDLS peer: no > > Station 00:15:6d:94:5a:39 (on mesh2) > > inactive time: 17702 ms > > rx bytes: 1539 > > rx packets: 23 > > tx bytes: 1090 > > tx packets: 7 > > tx retries: 6 > > tx failed: 1 > > signal: -62 dBm > > signal avg: -61 dBm > > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s > > mesh llid: 0 > > mesh plid: 0 > > mesh plink: ESTAB > > authorized: yes > > authenticated: yes > > preamble: long > > WMM/WME: yes > > MFP: yes > > TDLS peer: no > > Station 00:15:6d:94:6e:6b (on mesh2) > > inactive time: 721 ms > > rx bytes: 544314 > > rx packets: 6054 > > tx bytes: 254624 > > tx packets: 883 > > tx retries: 58 > > tx failed: 0 > > signal: -46 dBm > > signal avg: -46 dBm > > Toffset: 490313930 us > > tx bitrate: 54.0 MBit/s > > mesh llid: 0 > > mesh plid: 0 > > mesh plink: ESTAB > > authorized: yes > > authenticated: yes > > preamble: long > > WMM/WME: yes > > MFP: yes > > TDLS peer: no > > > > If I reboot the routers the same thing happens. > > I have tried with and without nohwencrypt=1 > > I have also applied the patch > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg95993.html which was > missing > > for the latest build > > any help on what to look for would be appreciated. > > > > I think this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1429831/ was > meant to replace the one you applied. Can you try without Chun-Yeow's > original mgmt frame encryption patch for ath5k? > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
